Corrections
Corrections log
Every substantive factual correction made to this site, dated, with what changed and why. Kept in public because a site that claims to be careful about evidence should be checkable on its own record.
The log
No corrections yet. This site published its first articles on 15 August 2026, so an empty log currently means “new” rather than “flawless”. Treat it as informative from about the six-month mark.
When entries appear here they will carry the date, the page affected, what the page said before, what it says now, and who reported it if the correction came from a reader.
What counts as a correction
- A factual error. A wrong number, a misattributed source, a study described inaccurately.
- An overstated claim. Presenting a single study as consensus, or a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated effect.
- A source that does not support the claim it was cited for.
- A guideline that has changed since publication and was not updated.
Typos, formatting fixes and rewording that does not change meaning are not logged. Everything that changes what a reader would conclude is.
The claim most likely to end up here
For transparency about where I think the risk sits: the position that fixed-interval sleep cycle alignment is unproven is a claim about the absence of evidence, and claims about absence are the ones most vulnerable to being wrong. If a study exists demonstrating that cycle-aligned wake times reduce sleep inertia against a matched-duration control, the audit article and the homepage both need revising, and that revision would appear here.
If you know of such a study, please send it.
How to report something
Point at the page and the specific sentence, and say what is wrong with it. A link to a contradicting source makes it far faster to act on, but is not required — if a passage is unclear or misleading, that is worth reporting on its own.
Found something wrong?
Corrections are logged in public with credit to whoever reported them.
Tell us